Mito Red Light Review 2026: Which Panel Is Actually Worth Buying

Affiliate disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. See our affiliate disclosure for details.

Mito Red Light is worth your attention for one unusual reason: it publishes two irradiance figures for every panel it sells, one measured on a consumer meter and one measured in an accredited lab, and it tells you which is which. Almost nobody in this category does that.

Where this comes from, plainly. We own one red light panel, imported, mounted at standing height, and we use it most days. It is not a Mito. So this is a specification, pricing and certification review built from Mito Red Light's own panel-series spec tables, four individual product pages, its published independent-test-data page, the live Amazon listings and Hooga's own store, all read on 12 October 2026. Where Mito does not publish a figure we say so rather than filling the cell.

Last reviewed: October 2026

---

Quick comparison: every Mito panel, plus the cheap alternative

Product	Best for	Price	Coverage	Wavelengths	Irradiance at 6" (consumer / lab)	Rating
MitoMEGA 2.0	Best overall value, full body	$1,049	36" × 12", 300 LEDs	660, 850nm	>165 / >74 mW/cm²	4.6
MitoMAX 2.0	Full body on a budget	$749	36" × 9", 200 LEDs	660, 850nm	>155 / >70 mW/cm²	4.5
MitoPRO 1500X	Six wavelengths and app control	$1,299	10" × 43", 300/600 LEDs	590, 630, 660, 810, 830, 850nm	>160 / >73 mW/cm²	4.4
MitoMID 2.0	Half body, best power per dollar	$449	19" × 9", 100 LEDs	660, 850nm	>150 / >68 mW/cm²	4.3
MitoPRO 1500+	Four wavelengths, full body	$1,169	12" × 36", 300 LEDs	630, 660, 830, 850nm	>170 / >68 mW/cm²	4.2
MitoMIN 2.0	Face, neck, targeted joints	$249	12" × 9", 60 LEDs	660, 850nm	>115 / >52 mW/cm²	4.1
MitoADAPT MAX 4.0	Eight wavelengths, 11 modes	$1,499	12" × 36", 288/576 LEDs	590, 630, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 940nm	>140 / >60 mW/cm²	3.9
MitoPRO 300X	Tabletop, six wavelengths	$449	9.5" × 14.5", 60/120 LEDs	590, 630, 660, 810, 830, 850nm	>130 / >56 mW/cm²	3.8
Hooga PRO1500	Cheapest honest full-body rival	$1,199	300 dual-chip LEDs	660, 850nm	Not published in this format	4.1
Hooga HG300	Cheapest way to start	$149 direct / $199 Amazon	60 LEDs	660, 850nm	Not published in this format	4.0

Prices and specs read on 12 October 2026 from mitoredlight.com, hoogahealth.com and the live Amazon listings, and they move. Mito prices matched on both its own store and Amazon the day we looked; the Hooga HG300 did not, which is why that row carries two numbers. Confirm the current price before you buy.

Ratings are ours. Every Mito figure in the table is the brand's own published number, and the four rows without an affiliate link are sold direct from mitoredlight.com only. More on that below.

---

The two irradiance numbers, and why only one of them compares

Irradiance decides whether a panel can put a useful dose into you in a session you will actually sit through. Dose is just irradiance multiplied by time: a panel putting out 60 mW/cm² delivers roughly 3.6 J/cm² in a minute, so a 10-minute session lands around 36 J/cm². Published photobiomodulation work tends to use doses in that broad neighbourhood, which is why the number matters more than the LED count.

Brands measure it two completely different ways, though, and the gap is close to double.

A cheap solar meter reads broadband optical power across the whole spectrum. Point one at a red light panel and it counts everything, including output at wavelengths with no therapeutic rationale, and returns a flattering figure. A professional spectroradiometer isolates the specific therapeutic wavelengths and reports only those. Mito's own test page puts it bluntly: solar meters "measure broadband optical power and consistently overstate what's reaching tissue at PBM-relevant wavelengths."

Mito publishes both, labelled. Its lab column comes from LightLab International Allentown, LLC, an ISO/IEC 17025-accredited lab using NIST-traceable instrumentation, measured at 6 inches, and the brand says it has published this data since 2019. Thirteen models have reports on that page.

Here is why this is the most practical thing on the whole site. A competitor quoting 150 mW/cm² from a solar meter looks twice as powerful as a Mito panel quoting 74 mW/cm² from an accredited lab, and the Mito panel may well be the stronger of the two. If you are comparing panels across brands, you have to compare the same kind of measurement, and most brands only give you the generous one. When a brand publishes a single number with no method attached, assume it is the consumer-meter figure and discount it accordingly.

One honest caveat about the lab data: it is commissioned and published by Mito, not by an independent reviewer who bought a panel at retail. The lab is genuinely accredited and the method is stated, which is more than most of the category offers, and it is still the brand choosing what to publish. We have not metered a Mito panel ourselves.

---

Mito sells four separate panel lines, and the names do not help

Four lines, overlapping prices, three different size conventions. This is the part that trips up most buyers.

Mito Red Original 2.0 (MitoMIN, MitoMID, MitoMAX, MitoMEGA). Two wavelengths, 660nm and 850nm. Dual switches, a built-in timer, ETL and BSCI certification, a 60-degree beam angle, a stated 50,000-hour LED lifespan, and two years of warranty. $249 to $1,049. This is the older, simpler line, and it is the only one on Amazon.

MitoPRO+ (300+, 1000+, 1500+). Four wavelengths: 630, 660, 830 and 850nm. A simple on/off switch, no app, three modes. ETL certified but not UL Medical. $369 to $1,169 for single panels.

MitoPRO X (300X, 750X, 1500X). Six wavelengths, adding 590nm and 810nm. Touchscreen plus smartphone app, three modes, and the certification step that matters: UL Medical to IEC 60601. Three-year warranty. $449 to $1,299. FDA Class II registration is not what separates this line: Mito describes its whole catalogue that way, Original 2.0 panels included.

MitoADAPT 4.0 (MIN, MID, MAX). Eight wavelengths, adding 670nm and 940nm, on eight independent circuits giving 11 selectable modes. $549 to $1,499.

Read the ladder as wavelengths and control rather than power, because that is what it actually is. The dearest single panel Mito sells, the $1,499 MitoADAPT MAX 4.0, publishes >60 mW/cm² in the lab column. The $1,049 MitoMEGA 2.0 publishes >74. Spreading output across eight wavelengths and eight circuits costs you intensity in any one of them, and Mito's own numbers show it.

That is not a criticism of the ADAPT. If you want to run a 670nm protocol or a 940nm one, no cheaper panel in the range can do it at all. It is a criticism of reading the price as a power ranking.

---

Mito's flagship panels are not on Amazon

We checked this two ways on 12 October 2026, because it changes how you buy.

An Amazon search for "Mito Red Light therapy panel" returned 685 results, of which three were Mito products: the MitoMEGA 2.0 at $1,049, the MitoMIN 2.0 at $249 and the MitoMAX 2.0 at $749. A second search for "MitoPRO X red light therapy panel" returned no MitoPRO or MitoADAPT panel at all, just the same Original 2.0 models and a row of BestQool competitors. The MitoMID 2.0 is the exception: its old Amazon listing now redirects to the MitoMAX 2.0 page at $749, so three of the four Original 2.0 panels are the ones you can reliably buy there.

So if you want a MitoPRO+, a MitoPRO X or a MitoADAPT 4.0, mitoredlight.com is the only place to buy it, and any Amazon search result claiming otherwise is a different brand. If you want an Original 2.0 panel, you have a genuine choice, and the two prices matched exactly on the day we looked. The Amazon listings are sold by Mito Red Light Official rather than a reseller, which is the detail worth checking before you click any listing in this category.

Worth knowing either way: Mito's store advertises free US shipping to the lower 48, a 60-day money-back guarantee, HSA and FSA eligibility because its devices are FDA Class II registered, and financing through Shopify's installment partners. Amazon's own 30-day return window is shorter than Mito's 60 days.

---

The panels, honestly ranked

MitoMEGA 2.0 (~$1,049): the one we would buy

$1,049 · 300 LEDs · 36" × 12" × 3" · 25 lbs · 450W · 660 and 850nm · >165 consumer / >74 lab mW/cm²

Pros:

• Highest lab-measured irradiance of any panel Mito publishes, at the fourth-highest price
• Genuine full-body coverage at 36 by 12 inches
• Same price on Amazon and direct, so you can pick your return policy
• 50,000-hour stated LED lifespan and a 60-degree beam angle

Cons:

• Two wavelengths only, so no 590nm, 670nm, 810nm or 940nm
• Two-year warranty against three on the MitoPRO X
• No app, no touchscreen, no brightness control
• 25 lbs and 450W, so it wants a wall mount or a stand rather than a door hook

The thing to understand about this panel is that it wins on the metric Mito itself argues is the honest one. At >74 mW/cm² in the LightLab column it beats the $1,299 MitoPRO 1500X (>73) and comfortably beats the $1,499 MitoADAPT MAX 4.0 (>60). What you give up is the wavelength menu and the controls. If your use is whole-body recovery after training, 660nm and 850nm are the two best-studied wavelengths for that anyway.

Best for: anyone who wants the most light per dollar from this brand and does not need the extra wavelengths.

Check price →

MitoMAX 2.0 (~$749): the value pick

$749 · 200 LEDs · 36" × 9" × 3" · 20 lbs · 300W · 660 and 850nm · >155 consumer / >70 lab mW/cm²

Pros:

• $300 cheaper than the MEGA for 5 mW/cm² less in the lab column
• Full 36-inch height, so the coverage is still torso or legs in one position
• Same $749 on Amazon and direct
• Door-hanging friendly at 20 lbs

Cons:

• 9 inches wide rather than 12, so the beam is narrower than the MEGA's
• Two wavelengths, two-year warranty
• 300W is a real draw for a bedroom circuit shared with other equipment

The MAX is the panel most people should probably buy instead of the one they came for. The MEGA's advantage over it is three inches of width and about 6% more lab-measured output for 40% more money.

Best for: full-body sessions where the budget stops around $750.

Check price →

MitoPRO 1500X (~$1,299): the flagship that earns its price on certification

$1,299 · 300/600 LEDs · 10" × 43" · 25 lbs · 445W · 590, 630, 660, 810, 830, 850nm · >160 consumer / >73 lab mW/cm²

Pros:

• Six wavelengths including 810nm, the wavelength the transcranial research uses
• UL Medical to IEC 60601, including the home light therapy equipment standard 60601-2-83
• Three-year warranty, the longest Mito offers
• Touchscreen plus app, and a TruDual chip design that lets you run the whole panel as red or as near-infrared
• 43 inches tall, the tallest single panel in the range

Cons:

• Direct from mitoredlight.com only
• Lab irradiance sits a shade below the $1,049 MitoMEGA 2.0
• 10 inches wide, so tall and narrow rather than broad
• Mito states "no detectable EMF" at 6 inches or more, which is the brand's own measurement, not an independent one

If the certification matters to you, this is the panel. IEC 60601 is the medical electrical equipment family, and 60601-2-83 is specifically home light therapy equipment, which is a meaningfully higher bar than the ETL electrical safety mark on the cheaper lines. The three-year warranty on a device with a fan and a driver board is worth real money.

Best for: buyers who want medical-grade certification, 810nm, and app control, and who are not shopping on Amazon.

MitoMID 2.0 (~$449): the best power-per-dollar panel in the range

$449 · 100 LEDs · 19" × 9" × 3" · 9 lbs · 150W · 660 and 850nm · >150 consumer / >68 lab mW/cm²

Pros:

• Matches the $1,169 MitoPRO 1500+ in the lab column at >68 mW/cm²
• 9 lbs, so it hangs on a door or sits on a table without a stand
• Cheapest Mito panel with a lab figure above 60 mW/cm²
• Built-in digital timer, settable from 1 to 20 minutes
• Mito cites third-party testing suggesting 34,020 joules delivered in 10 minutes

Cons:

• 19 inches of height is half-body coverage, not full
• Two wavelengths
• The joules figure is a total-output number across the panel, not a dose at one spot, so do not read it as 34,020 J/cm²
• Buy it direct. The Amazon ASIN that used to carry it redirects to the MitoMAX 2.0 listing at $749, so an Amazon click gets you the wrong panel at $300 more

Best for: one body region at a time, at the lowest cost per unit of verified output.

MitoPRO 1500+ (~$1,169): four wavelengths, no app

$1,169 · 300 LEDs · 12" × 36" · 22 lbs · 375W · 630, 660, 830, 850nm · >170 consumer / >68 lab mW/cm²

Pros:

• Highest consumer-meter figure Mito publishes, at >170 mW/cm²
• Four wavelengths, with 630nm added for skin and 830nm for joints
• 12 by 36 inches is the widest full-body footprint in the flagship lines
• Simple switch operation, nothing to pair or update

Cons:

• The consumer-meter headline is the flattering number; the lab figure of >68 is below the cheaper MitoMEGA 2.0
• ETL certified but not UL Medical, unlike the X and ADAPT lines
• No app, no brightness control, three fixed modes
• Direct only

This panel is the clearest illustration of why the two-column irradiance table matters. Read the left column and it is the most powerful panel Mito sells. Read the right one and it ties with a $449 MitoMID 2.0.

Best for: someone who wants 630nm and 830nm coverage and will not use an app.

MitoMIN 2.0 (~$249): the tabletop

$249 · 60 LEDs · 12" × 9" × 3" · 7 lbs · 85W · 660 and 850nm · >115 consumer / >52 lab mW/cm²

Pros:

• Cheapest way into the brand
• 7 lbs and 85W, so it works on a desk or kitchen counter
• Amazon listing sold by Mito Red Light Official, rated 4.5 from 173 ratings
• Same $249 direct and on Amazon

Cons:

• Lowest lab figure in the range at >52 mW/cm², so sessions take longer for the same dose
• 12 by 9 inches treats a face, a knee or a shoulder, nothing more
• Two wavelengths, two-year warranty

At >52 mW/cm², ten minutes puts roughly 31 J/cm² into the treated spot, which is a reasonable targeted dose. The limit is area, not intensity.

Best for: face, scalp, a single joint, or finding out whether you will keep the habit.

Check price →

MitoADAPT MAX 4.0 (~$1,499): the one you buy for the wavelengths

$1,499 · 288/576 LEDs · 12" × 36" · 25 lbs · 460W · 590, 630, 660, 670, 810, 830, 850, 940nm · >140 consumer / >60 lab mW/cm²

Pros:

• Eight wavelengths on eight independent circuits, 11 selectable modes
• The only way to get 670nm or 940nm from this brand
• UL Medical, app control with session tracking
• Patent-pending TruDual chip and a quad lens array, per Mito's own description

Cons:

• Most expensive single panel Mito sells and the lowest lab irradiance of its three full-body peers
• $450 more than the MitoMEGA 2.0 for 14 fewer mW/cm² in the lab column
• Eleven modes is a lot of interface for a device most people use one way
• Direct only

Buy this if you have a specific reason to want 670nm or 940nm. Mito's own research framing describes the evidence for both as emerging rather than Level I, so for most buyers this is paying a premium for optionality they will not use.

MitoPRO 300X (~$449): skip it

$449 · 60/120 LEDs · 9.5" × 14.5" · 7 lbs · 125W · 590, 630, 660, 810, 830, 850nm · >130 consumer / >56 lab mW/cm²

Pros:

• Six wavelengths and a touchscreen in a 7 lb tabletop
• UL Medical to IEC 60601, unusual at this size
• Ships with a tabletop stand, goggles and IR3 glasses

Cons:

• $200 more than a MitoMIN 2.0 for roughly the same coverage

• 56 mW/cm² in the lab column, below the $449 MitoMID 2.0's >68 across twice the area

• At this price the MitoMID 2.0 is the better buy unless you specifically need 810nm in a small panel

Hooga PRO1500 (~$1,199): the alternative worth pricing against

$1,199 · 300 dual-chip LEDs · 660 and 850nm · 4.3 stars from 21 Amazon ratings

Hooga sells at $1,199 on both its own store and Amazon, where the listing is sold by Hooga Health. It is a two-wavelength, dual-chip full-body panel with a timer and a door-hanging kit, and it sits $150 above the MitoMEGA 2.0.

What you give up is the published lab data. Hooga does not publish the paired consumer-and-lab irradiance tables Mito does, so you cannot line the two panels up on the one metric that matters. That is the reason we rank the MitoMEGA 2.0 above it at a lower price.

Check price →

Hooga HG300 (~$149 direct, ~$199 Amazon): the cheapest honest start

$149 on hoogahealth.com, $199 on Amazon · 60 LEDs · 660 and 850nm · 4.6 stars from 1,377 Amazon ratings

The only panel here with a price gap worth naming: $149 on Hooga's own store and $199 on the Amazon listing, both read on 12 October 2026, both sold by Hooga Health. Buy direct and save $50, or buy on Amazon for the returns handling.

It is a 60-LED tabletop with a timer and an adjustable stand, and it is the single cheapest way to find out whether you will use red light therapy three times a week before spending four figures. Our portable red light device guide covers the rest of that tier.

Check price →

---

FDA Class II registered is not FDA cleared

Mito describes its entire panel catalogue as FDA Class II registered, the cheaper Original 2.0 line included. The MitoMEGA 2.0 product page carries the badge next to its ETL and BSCI marks, and that page's HSA/FSA notice puts it plainly: "as an FDA Class II registered medical device, Mito Red Light products qualify". So it is not a MitoPRO X or MitoADAPT achievement, and the thing that actually separates those two lines is UL Medical certification to IEC 60601. Registration means the establishment and the device are listed with the FDA. It is not a 510(k) clearance for a specific medical indication, and the FDA itself says registration does not denote approval or clearance.

That is the normal, expected status for a full-body wellness panel, and it is true of Joovv, Hooga and PlatinumLED as well. It is only a problem when a brand uses the badge to imply a cleared medical claim. Mito's panel pages stay on general wellness language, and the brand's research page explicitly states that the studies it cites are of photobiomodulation as a modality and the wavelengths involved, not of Mito devices, and that it has not funded registered trials on its own hardware. That disclosure is better than most of this category manages.

Separately, Mito describes its MitoGLOW face mask as FDA-cleared. That is a different and higher claim than registration, and if you are buying for a cleared indication, ask for the K-number and check it. Our guide to FDA-cleared red light therapy devices walks through that check in about two minutes.

---

Buyer's guide: getting this one right

Pick the size from the body part, not the budget. A 12 by 9 inch panel treats a face or a knee. Nineteen inches treats a shoulder girdle or a lower back. Thirty-six inches treats a torso or a pair of legs in one position. Buying a tabletop and hoping to cover your back means four repositionings per session, which is how panels end up in cupboards.

Compare lab figures with lab figures. If the panel you are weighing up against a Mito publishes one irradiance number with no method, treat it as a consumer-meter reading. Mito's own data shows the two differ by roughly half on the same hardware.

Decide whether you need more than 660 and 850nm. Those two are the best-studied wavelengths for muscle recovery and deep tissue, and the Original 2.0 line delivers them at the highest verified intensity Mito publishes. The extra wavelengths on the X and ADAPT lines map to skin, brain and wound-healing research where the evidence is thinner.

Check the warranty against the failure mode. These panels have fans and driver boards. Two years on the Original 2.0 line, three on the MitoPRO X. Over a 50,000-hour stated LED lifespan, the electronics are what fails first.

Work out the power draw before you order. The MitoMEGA 2.0 pulls 450W and the MitoADAPT MAX 460W. Both are fine on a normal US circuit, but not sharing one with a space heater.

Treat the health claims as research-stage. Studies indicate photobiomodulation can reduce muscle soreness and support skin and joint outcomes at appropriate doses, and the evidence is stronger for some wavelengths than others. No panel is a medical treatment, and if you are pregnant, photosensitive, on photosensitising medication, or treating an active skin lesion, ask a doctor before starting. We go through the caveats in red light therapy side effects.

---

FAQ

Is Mito Red Light a good brand?

Yes, and for a specific reason: it publishes paired irradiance figures for 13 panels, one from a consumer meter and one from LightLab International Allentown, an ISO/IEC 17025-accredited lab using NIST-traceable instruments at 6 inches, and it has done so since 2019. Very little of this category publishes accredited lab data at all. The company lists a real US address in Scottsdale, Arizona, a phone number, a 60-day money-back guarantee and free US shipping. The caveat is that the lab testing is commissioned and published by the brand rather than by an independent buyer.

Which Mito Red Light panel is best?

For most buyers, the MitoMEGA 2.0 at $1,049. It publishes >74 mW/cm² at 6 inches in the lab column, which is the highest figure Mito gives for any panel it sells, and it covers 36 by 12 inches. The MitoPRO 1500X at $1,299 is the better pick if you want six wavelengths, app control and UL Medical certification to IEC 60601. The MitoMAX 2.0 at $749 is the better pick if the budget stops there.

How much does a Mito Red Light panel cost?

Single panels run $249 to $1,499 on mitoredlight.com as of 12 October 2026. The Original 2.0 line is $249 for the MitoMIN, $449 for the MitoMID, $749 for the MitoMAX and $1,049 for the MitoMEGA. The MitoPRO+ line runs $369 to $1,169, MitoPRO X $449 to $1,299, and MitoADAPT 4.0 $549 to $1,499. Multi-panel arrays go up to $4,496.

Is Mito Red Light sold on Amazon?

Partly. The MitoMIN 2.0, MitoMAX 2.0 and MitoMEGA 2.0 are on Amazon, sold by Mito Red Light Official, at the same prices as the brand's own store. The MitoMID 2.0's Amazon link redirects to the MitoMAX page, so buy that one direct. Searching Amazon for a MitoPRO X or MitoADAPT panel on 12 October 2026 returned neither, so those two lines are direct from mitoredlight.com only. Any Amazon result that looks like a MitoPRO is another brand's panel.

What is the difference between MitoPRO+, MitoPRO X and MitoADAPT 4.0?

Wavelengths and controls. MitoPRO+ has four wavelengths (630, 660, 830, 850nm) and a simple switch. MitoPRO X adds 590nm and 810nm for six, plus a touchscreen, app control and UL Medical certification to IEC 60601. MitoADAPT 4.0 adds 670nm and 940nm for eight, on eight independent circuits giving 11 modes. Intensity does not climb with the ladder: the brand's lab figures put MitoADAPT MAX 4.0 at >60 mW/cm², below the MitoPRO 1500X's >73.

What irradiance does a Mito Red Light panel deliver?

Between >52 and >74 mW/cm² at 6 inches in Mito's accredited-lab column, depending on the model, and between >115 and >170 mW/cm² on a consumer meter. The lowest is the MitoMIN 2.0 and the highest is the MitoMEGA 2.0. When comparing against other brands, use the lab figure, because most brands quote only the consumer-meter equivalent and the two differ by roughly half.

How long should a red light therapy session be?

At the output these panels publish, 10 minutes at 6 inches puts roughly 31 to 44 J/cm² into the treated area, which sits in the range published photobiomodulation work typically uses. Mito's Original 2.0 panels have timers settable from 1 to 20 minutes, which brackets it. More is not better: the research describes a dose-response curve where very high doses can reduce the effect. Our session length guide goes into the dosing maths.

Is Mito Red Light FDA approved?

No, and no consumer red light panel is. Mito describes its panels as FDA Class II registered right across the catalogue, from the $249 MitoMIN 2.0 up, which means the device and establishment are listed with the FDA. Registration is not the same as a 510(k) clearance for a medical indication, and it is not approval. That is the standard status for a general wellness panel across this category, including Joovv, Hooga and PlatinumLED.

Does Mito Red Light have low EMF?

Mito states that at 6 inches or more the MitoPRO X emits no detectable EMF, and describes low EMF and flicker-free drivers across all three panel lines. Those are the brand's own measurements and we have not verified them with a meter. The 6-inch condition is doing real work in that sentence, since EMF falls off sharply with distance and 6 inches is also the distance the irradiance figures are measured at.

---

Our Verdict

If we were replacing our own panel with a Mito today, we would buy the MitoMEGA 2.0 at $1,049 and not think twice. It publishes the highest accredited-lab irradiance of anything in the range, at >74 mW/cm² at 6 inches, covers 36 by 12 inches, and costs $450 less than the MitoADAPT MAX 4.0 that publishes >60. The brand's own data makes that case; we are just reading the right column.

The MitoPRO X line is the one worth paying up for if certification is what you came for, because UL Medical to IEC 60601 and a three-year warranty are real, and the 810nm channel is the only route to the transcranial research wavelength here. The MitoADAPT 4.0 is for people with a named reason to want 670nm or 940nm, and nobody else. The MitoMAX 2.0 at $749 is the pick if the budget is the constraint, and the MitoMIN 2.0 at $249 is the pick if the question is still whether you will use one at all.

More in this category: our red light therapy panel ranking, Mito Red against PlatinumLED, Joovv against Mito, which wavelengths actually matter, and the rest of the red light therapy gear we cover. More about what we own and how we rank on our about page.